The Rise and Fall of a Sole Arab Marxist State and Links
to the Horn
South Yemen’s attempt to graft Marxism onto a deeply tribal
society delivered real social change yet ultimately proved politically
self-undermining. The People’s Democratic Republic of Yemen (PDRY) emerged from
Britain’s withdrawal from Aden in 1967 and soon aligned with the Soviet bloc.
Women’s participation increased, education expanded, and local councils
established themselves. But Cold War crosswinds, regional rivalry, and
unresolved internal fractures steadily eroded the project. As the Yemen Arab
Republic (YAR, North Yemen) lurched through coups, the south radicalised—each
side’s turbulence reinforcing the other’s.
Origins and Diverging Paths (1960s–early 1970s)
North Yemen was ruled for over a thousand years by a Zaydi
(a branch of Shi’a Islam that shares notable jurisprudential affinities with
Sunni traditions) Imamate that combined clerical and tribal authority. After
the Ottoman withdrawal in 1918, the Mutawakkilite Kingdom, under the leadership
of Imam Yahya, established a patrimonial system that kept the country isolated
and stagnant. In 1962, military officers, inspired by Nasser’s coup of 1952 in
Egypt, overthrew the Imamate, declaring Yemen a republic. This ignited an
eight-year civil war, turning Yemen into a proxy theatre of the Arab Cold War between
the royalists supported by Saudi Arabia, Jordan, and Britain, on one side, and
Egypt and socialist states, on the other. Egypt sent some 60,000 troops, lost
roughly 10,000 soldiers, and became bogged down in a quagmire dubbed “Egypt’s
Vietnam,” which sapped strength before the 1967 Arab–Israeli war. This war lasted until 1970. Saudi Arabia has
been bogged down in the Yemeni war against the Houthis since 2014 and is
looking for a peaceful solution.
In the south,
Britain’s long presence in Aden (since 1839) evolved into the Aden Colony and
the Federation of South Arabia, but anti-colonial armed struggle erupted in
1963. The National Liberation Front
(NLF) defeated its Egyptian-backed rival,
the Front for the Liberation of South Yemen (FLOSY), and declared independence
in 1967. A 1969 “Corrective Move” consolidated radical rule, and by 1970, the
state adopted Marxism and the PDRY name.
The global Sino-Soviet split of the 1950s and 1960s that
divided the socialist world between Moscow’s centralized Marxism-Leninism and
Beijing’s Maoist revolutionary model, which accused the USSR of abandoning
Communism, filtered into Aden, dividing cadres between Maoist-inflected mass
mobilizers and orthodox Marxist-Leninists—schisms that mapped onto security
organs, party structures, and regional loyalties. Salim Rubai Ali (Salmeen)
leaned toward China’s mass-mobilization approach, Abdul Fattah Ismail
championed strict Soviet-style control and revolutionary export. At the same
time, Ali Nasir Muhammad
tried to strike a pragmatic balance. Their rivalries extended from major
questions of state power and foreign alignment to everyday policies, such as
food distribution and consumer goods.
Debates over whether vegetables should be sold in markets or
by the state, and whether a fan or fridge counted as a “luxury,” masked far
deeper battles over South Yemen’s future—how fast to transform society, how
much power the state should wield, and where the country fit in the Cold War
divide. Nationalization extended even into Hairdresser saloons, fishing, tea
shops, and taxis
North Yemen’s Reformist Interlude and Recoil (1974–1978)
After Egypt’s withdrawal, President Abdul Rahman al-Iryani
pursued reconciliation and secured Saudi recognition before drifting toward a
more independent line. In 1974, the 31-year-old Ibrahim al-Hamdi seized power
in a bloodless coup, attempting to curb the influence of tribal sheiks,
professionalize the state, empower local development associations, and initiate
dialogue with the south. Many Yemenis still regard him as an honest modernizer
who glimpsed a path to reform and unity.
On 11 October 1977—one day before a planned unity visit to
Aden—President Ibrahim al-Hamdi was summoned to the home of his deputy, Ahmed
al-Ghashmi, reportedly under Saudi pressure to stop the trip. Earlier that day,
al-Hamdi’s brother Abdullah, a commando commander, was also killed at the same
residence after being lured there on a false pretext. Upon arrival, witnesses reported
that Ali Abdullah Saleh diverted the president while his bodyguards were kept
in another room; hours later, the guards were informed
that he had departed. Both brothers were later found dead in a separate house,
alongside two
French women, who had flown from Paris a few days earlier, widely seen as a
staged scandal to discredit al-Hamdi. Subsequent accounts and investigations have
alleged a plot involving al-Ghashmi, Saleh, and the Saudi military attaché,
with Saudi Arabia opposed to al-Hamdi’s push for North–South unity and his
March 1977 Red Sea security initiative. Al-Ghashmi succeeded al-Hamdi as
president soon after. His assassination ended that experiment and restored
forces more comfortable with a divided Yemen.
Radicalisation, Retrenchment, and Strain in the South
(1978–1985)
Al-Ghashmi succeeded al-Hamdi but was killed in June 1978 by
a briefcase bomb delivered by a South Yemeni envoy; responsibility is widely
attributed to Aden but remains disputed. Two days later, South Yemen’s President
Salim Rubai Ali (Salmeen) was executed, accused of killing Al-Ghashmi, amid Yemeni Socialist Party (YSP) infighting,
clearing the way for Abdul Fattah Ismail’s hard-line leadership and Ali
Abdullah Saleh’s long presidency in the north. By 1978, the National Liberation
Front had refashioned itself into the Yemeni Socialist Party (YSP, but the new
banner masked deepening rifts. Under Abdul Fattah Ismail (1978–1980), the YSP imposed
a hard-line Marxist-Leninist vision, tightly aligned with the USSR and East
Germany. One-party rule hardened, dissent was crushed, and foreign policy
turned outward in support of revolutionary movements from Dhofar to the Horn of
Africa, placing the PDRY in open confrontation with Saudi Arabia, North Yemen,
and Western powers. The split within the YSP widened as Ismail’s camp demanded
rapid socialist transformation and “exporting revolution.” At the same time,
moderates urged pragmatism—easing ideological rigidity, repairing ties with
Arab states, and prioritizing development. The 1979 North–South war
crystallized the split; Ismail resigned in 1980 and went into exile, and Ali
Nasir Muhammad took over, adopting a more pragmatic line that never resolved
the underlying fissures.
By 1985, dissatisfaction with Ali Nasir’s leadership—seen by
rivals as overly conciliatory abroad and increasingly authoritarian at
home—prompted hardliners to engineer Ismail’s return; at the YSP’s Third
Congress that October, he reentered the Politburo. Aden polarised anew along
ideological, regional, and even tribal lines, with both sides quietly arming
loyalists and anticipating a reckoning. A decisive Politburo session was set
for January 13, 1986. Ali Nasir acted first, and the long-brewing confrontation
exploded into the Aden civil war.
The Aden Catastrophe: January 1986
On 13 January 1986, a YSP Politburo meeting in Aden’s
al-Tawahi district became a deadly ambush: Ali Nasir’s loyal guards stormed the
session while his allies stayed away; several leaders were killed; Abdul Fattah
Ismail initially escaped, though his ultimate fate remains uncertain. Twelve
days of urban warfare—tanks, artillery, and airstrikes—devastated the city. By
day ten, Ali Nasir fled with tens of thousands of followers to the north; by 25
January, Ali Salem al-Beidh’s camp had consolidated control at the cost of
thousands of lives and the decimation of the YSP’s senior ranks. The
bloodletting shattered the PDRY’s political and military core and turned unity
from aspiration into necessity.
Unification and Unravelling (1990–1994)
As global communism faltered, Aden’s options narrowed. For
Saleh—firm in power in Sana’a since 1978—absorbing the south promised strategic
depth and legitimacy; for the battered southern leadership, unity offered a
lifeline. After extended negotiations, the two states merged in 1990 to form
the Republic of Yemen. Initial euphoria masked asymmetries: the north held
demographic weight, tighter tribal networks, and control of security; the
south, scarred by purges, struggled to assert its interests. Accusations of
northern monopolization mounted, culminating in the 1994 civil war and the
swift defeat of a renewed southern independence bid.
Across the Bab al-Mandab: Links to the Horn of Africa
The two shores of the Red Sea are a narrow crossing tied by
centuries of trade, migration, and cultural exchange; scholars trace affinities
between ancient South Arabian scripts and Geʿez
and debate population movements across the strait. In the modern era, South
Yemen supported Eritrean liberation movements and aligned with revolutionary
governments in Somalia and Ethiopia. During the 1977–78 Somali–Ethiopian war,
Aden initially leaned toward Mogadishu, but the Soviet camp’s support for Addis
Ababa ultimately prevailed. After unification, the 1995 Hanish Islands crisis
with Eritrea was resolved through international arbitration in 1998—an essential
reminder that disputes in this corridor can end without war.
Outcome and Lessons
The PDRY’s gains—in education, women’s participation, and
attempts at accountable local institutions—were real. Yet imported ideological
templates were not adapted sufficiently to Yemen’s social fabric and economic
limits; factionalism within the revolutionary elite turned fatal when mediation
failed; and small states anchored to distant patrons without balancing regional
realities invited blowback. Today’s fractured Yemen—Houthis dominant in the
north, renewed southern mobilisation, and deep Gulf involvement—bears the
imprint of those choices. The rise and fall of South Yemen reads as both a
record and a caution: modernisation without inclusion is brittle; unity without
power-sharing curdles into resentment; and ideology, unmoored from its local
context, is outmatched by the stubborn arithmetic of geography, institutions,
and interests on both sides of the Red Sea.
Today, Yemen remains unsettled: the Houthis hold the north, the
southern independence movement has re-emerged since the Arab Spring in 2011, and
Gulf power interventions compound the turmoil.
No comments:
Post a Comment